For most US-Connected Persons living abroad, renunciation of citizenship — or relinquishment of a green card — is not on the table. The US passport is valuable, the connection to the United States is real, and the idea of formally severing that tie is either unthinkable or simply not worth considering.
But for a growing number of people, the calculation is changing. The compliance burden, the banking access barriers, the investment restrictions, the double-taxation complexity — taken together, they represent a material cost of maintaining US status. And for some individuals, at some wealth levels, the cost of staying exceeds the value of what they're holding onto.
Understanding what renunciation actually involves — and what it costs — is increasingly part of the conversation for serious cross-border financial planning. Even for those who will never pursue it, understanding the exit tax framework illuminates why the US compliance regime is designed the way it is.
The State Department publishes quarterly data on renunciations and relinquishments. The numbers have risen substantially over the past decade, though they remain modest in absolute terms relative to the total US-Connected Person population abroad. The people most likely to explore renunciation typically share some combination of:
• Longstanding residence outside the United States with no near-term intention to return.
• Meaningful wealth accumulated in non-US structures that create ongoing PFIC, FBAR, and FATCA complexity.
• A non-US citizen spouse whose financial life is substantially complicated by the US person's status.
• Frustration with banking and investment access restrictions that materially limit financial planning options.
• Second-generation considerations — concern about passing US tax obligations to children born abroad.
The exit tax — formally governed by IRC Section 877A — applies to 'covered expatriates': US citizens who renounce citizenship, and long-term residents (green card holders for 8 of the last 15 years) who relinquish their status.
You are a covered expatriate if you meet any of the following:
• Your average annual net income tax liability for the five years preceding expatriation exceeds a set threshold ($206,000 for 2024, indexed).
• Your net worth on the date of expatriation is $2 million or more.
• You fail to certify five years of US tax compliance.
If you are a covered expatriate, Section 877A imposes a mark-to-market regime: you are treated as having sold all of your worldwide assets at fair market value on the day before expatriation. Any gain above an exclusion amount ($866,000 for 2024) is taxed at capital gains rates. This is a tax on unrealized gains — you may owe substantial tax on assets you haven't sold and may not intend to sell.
For covered expatriates with concentrated positions in private businesses, real estate, or long-held investment portfolios, the exit tax can represent a significant — sometimes prohibitive — cost. The tax must be paid even if the assets are illiquid.
The exit tax treatment of deferred compensation and retirement accounts deserves specific attention:
• IRAs and qualified plans: a covered expatriate is treated as having received a distribution of the entire account balance on the day before expatriation, subject to income tax (but not the 10% early withdrawal penalty).
• Deferred compensation: depending on whether the plan is 'eligible' or 'ineligible,' treatment varies — but covered expatriates generally face immediate or withholding-based taxation on deferred amounts.
For individuals with substantial retirement savings accumulated over a long career, this can represent a significant additional cost of expatriation.
Renunciation is a formal legal act. It requires:
• An in-person appointment at a US Embassy or Consulate abroad.
• A renunciation fee of $2,350 (one of the highest in the world for citizenship renunciation).
• Completion of Form 8854, the expatriation statement filed with the IRS.
• Five years of US tax compliance — you must be current on all filing obligations before renouncing.
Renunciation is irrevocable. It ends US citizenship permanently and cannot be undone. The decision deserves careful consideration, qualified legal and tax advice, and a clear-eyed assessment of both the costs and the benefits.
For the vast majority of US-Connected Persons abroad, the answer will be no — at least not now. The value of US citizenship extends well beyond its tax implications: travel access, the ability to return, family ties, professional options, and a sense of identity that cannot be reduced to a tax calculation.
But the fact that the question is being asked with increasing frequency is itself significant. It reflects a compliance architecture that imposes real costs on ordinary people living internationally — and that has not been meaningfully reformed to reflect the reality of how millions of Americans actually live.
The conversation about citizenship-based taxation is not going away. Whether the answer is reform, modernization, or individual exit decisions, US-Connected Persons deserve to make those choices with a clear understanding of what they're navigating.
This series has covered the major dimensions of that landscape: FBAR and FATCA reporting, the FEIE and Foreign Tax Credit, PFIC investment restrictions, estate and gift tax exposure, banking access challenges, and the exit tax. None of these issues exist in isolation — they interact, they compound, and they reward proactive planning over reactive compliance.
If you've found this series useful, I'd welcome the conversation. The cross-border financial planning space is underserved, and too many US-Connected Persons are navigating it without the guidance they need.
I write about cross-border financial planning and the obligations facing US-Connected Persons living and working internationally. Nothing in this series constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. Let's update the site.